<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, Bridget Johnson, You Think You&#8217;re Funny?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/</link>
	<description>Monitoring Anti-French Activity Since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:00:38 -0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miquelon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3216</link>
		<dc:creator>Miquelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3216</guid>
		<description>Enough - Locking this thread. Any more messages about posters and what they did elsewhere and further personal attacks will be unapproved immediately. We&#039;ve been through this already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough &#8211; Locking this thread. Any more messages about posters and what they did elsewhere and further personal attacks will be unapproved immediately. We&#8217;ve been through this already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney hasn't left the building</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney hasn't left the building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3207</guid>
		<description>Bon on va la laisser tranquille.  Ca devient trop méchant sinon.
Translation &gt; Don&#039;t feed the troll.

Ttruth from you, Sharon ? Of course. [ Blog comment rule # 3]

ps:  &lt;em&gt;But it could be that some people think they are so important no one should bash them.  That is called arrogance.
&lt;/em&gt;
Yeah because obviously, you don&#039;t mind being bashed yourself. LMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bon on va la laisser tranquille.  Ca devient trop méchant sinon.<br />
Translation &gt; Don&#8217;t feed the troll.</p>
<p>Ttruth from you, Sharon ? Of course. [ Blog comment rule # 3]</p>
<p>ps:  <em>But it could be that some people think they are so important no one should bash them.  That is called arrogance.<br />
</em><br />
Yeah because obviously, you don&#8217;t mind being bashed yourself. LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miquelon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3206</link>
		<dc:creator>Miquelon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3206</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Godwin&#039;s Law&lt;/a&gt; (also known as Godwin&#039;s Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a humorous observation coined by Mike Godwin in 1990, and which has become an Internet adage. It states: &quot;As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law" rel="nofollow">Godwin&#8217;s Law</a> (also known as Godwin&#8217;s Rule of Nazi Analogies) is a humorous observation coined by Mike Godwin in 1990, and which has become an Internet adage. It states: &#8220;As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>&quot;or you will definitely be labeled a troll&quot;
Ok, so are threatening to label me a troll unless I do as you say.  The [ Blog comment rule 3 ] has made his ruling, unless one does as they specify they will be labeled a troll.

By the way, I am waiting for Marc to take to task Barney for name calling and other sins which he listed are not allowed in this blog. Funny somehow those who toe the party line here are never asked to follow the rules of the blog and can indulge in personal attacks, name calling with impunity. 

Yes, but now I will be rebuked for exposing the owner of this blog&#039;s double standards &amp; [ Blog comment rule 3 ].


The fascist mentality such as threats of be labeled this or that is rampant here. After all it is not a mere coincidence that Europe gave birth to nazism, fascism &amp; communism. The mentality that gave birth to these idelogies is alive and well among Europeans . 

&quot;How are we supposed to take the following remark of yours ?
&lt;em&gt;
PS: So, you have to put up with bashing for 7 years?
Well., the Americans have had to put up with rabid bashing for more than 60 years ….food for thought.&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

So, you don&#039;t know how to take the truth? Thats the problem here isn&#039;t it?
When one is faced with the truth, they start howling and screaming  &#039;French bashing&#039; when the truth is not to their liking. 
Bashing? All major countries have to face bashing.  But it could be that some people think they are so important no one should bash them.  That is called arrogance.
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;or you will definitely be labeled a troll&#8221;<br />
Ok, so are threatening to label me a troll unless I do as you say.  The [ Blog comment rule 3 ] has made his ruling, unless one does as they specify they will be labeled a troll.</p>
<p>By the way, I am waiting for Marc to take to task Barney for name calling and other sins which he listed are not allowed in this blog. Funny somehow those who toe the party line here are never asked to follow the rules of the blog and can indulge in personal attacks, name calling with impunity. </p>
<p>Yes, but now I will be rebuked for exposing the owner of this blog&#8217;s double standards &amp; [ Blog comment rule 3 ].</p>
<p>The fascist mentality such as threats of be labeled this or that is rampant here. After all it is not a mere coincidence that Europe gave birth to nazism, fascism &amp; communism. The mentality that gave birth to these idelogies is alive and well among Europeans . </p>
<p>&#8220;How are we supposed to take the following remark of yours ?<br />
<em><br />
PS: So, you have to put up with bashing for 7 years?<br />
Well., the Americans have had to put up with rabid bashing for more than 60 years ….food for thought.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>So, you don&#8217;t know how to take the truth? Thats the problem here isn&#8217;t it?<br />
When one is faced with the truth, they start howling and screaming  &#8216;French bashing&#8217; when the truth is not to their liking. <br />
Bashing? All major countries have to face bashing.  But it could be that some people think they are so important no one should bash them.  That is called arrogance.<br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney hasn't left the building</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney hasn't left the building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Yes, I know I will now be labeled a troll&lt;/em&gt;

Wonder why... lol
&lt;em&gt;
oh let me see by pointing out that what goes on in this site is  people counter criticism of France by bashing Americans &amp; Brits .&lt;/em&gt;

So it&#039;s criticism against France but bashing against American and Brits ? Of course, master.&lt;em&gt;

well established historical facts such as the French leadership’s lack of courage during WW2&lt;/em&gt;

Yeah because this website is pro Vichy sure. That&#039;s what we have a problem with of course. Not the French people being called cowards on a daily basis. Right. And of course you were not aware of that.


&lt;em&gt;
This is exactly what I meant.
 Anyone who dares to speak the truth is immediately bashed …as trying to justify French bashing.&lt;/em&gt;

Don&#039;t confuse your truth with &lt;em&gt;the &lt;/em&gt;truth, which is more than one sided, please.
You don&#039;t justify French-bashing ?
How are we supposed to take the following remark of yours ?
&lt;em&gt;
PS: So, you have to put up with bashing for 7 years?
 Well., the Americans have had to put up with rabid bashing for more than 60 years ….food for thought.&lt;/em&gt;

And I hate to burst your bubble but I have never leveled false accusations at anyone here.
Telling our British friends, who come here to lecture us time and time again about the cowardice of French leadership (which is not what we have a problem with by the way), that faced with similar circumstances (ie the battle of France) they were defeated as well and retreated back to their island to regroup and fight back, which for obvious reasons was a luxury the French did not have, is not bashing or showing a lack of respect for the sacrifice of British troops, it&#039;s a fact. 
There&#039;s a reason Britan was never invaded in its long history and it&#039;s called the English Channel. Another fact
 The Brits are not genetically more courageous than the French. Another fact.

And frankly if that&#039;s all the bashing you will ever encounter, it kinda pales in comparison to the almost daily regiment of being called a coward, smelly, arrogant we have to suffer through.

And now if you wanna contend that American bashing and French-bashing are absolutely similar then you&#039;re going to show us documented evidence (and not that Jean François Revel essay which, unlike alll the trolls who have never bothered to read it, is actually more a documented history of the competition between 2 ideologies than it is a history of american bashing by French people) or you will definitely be labeled a troll

And FYI Charles Bremner&#039;s blog is not a nefarious little blog but  one of the biggest English speaking blog about France and it has a definite anti-French slant. At least do your homework before coming here to point fingers.

ps: And sorry but of course only someone with a major axe to grind about the French is gonna take time and come here on this anti French-bashing blog of all places to basically tell us to shut [ Blog comment rule 2 ] up and take the bashing with a smile and to not under any circumstances dare fight back.
Who do you think you&#039;re fooling ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Yes, I know I will now be labeled a troll</em></p>
<p>Wonder why&#8230; lol<br />
<em><br />
oh let me see by pointing out that what goes on in this site is  people counter criticism of France by bashing Americans &amp; Brits .</em></p>
<p>So it&#8217;s criticism against France but bashing against American and Brits ? Of course, master.<em></p>
<p>well established historical facts such as the French leadership’s lack of courage during WW2</em></p>
<p>Yeah because this website is pro Vichy sure. That&#8217;s what we have a problem with of course. Not the French people being called cowards on a daily basis. Right. And of course you were not aware of that.</p>
<p><em><br />
This is exactly what I meant.<br />
 Anyone who dares to speak the truth is immediately bashed …as trying to justify French bashing.</em></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t confuse your truth with <em>the </em>truth, which is more than one sided, please.<br />
You don&#8217;t justify French-bashing ?<br />
How are we supposed to take the following remark of yours ?<br />
<em><br />
PS: So, you have to put up with bashing for 7 years?<br />
 Well., the Americans have had to put up with rabid bashing for more than 60 years ….food for thought.</em></p>
<p>And I hate to burst your bubble but I have never leveled false accusations at anyone here.<br />
Telling our British friends, who come here to lecture us time and time again about the cowardice of French leadership (which is not what we have a problem with by the way), that faced with similar circumstances (ie the battle of France) they were defeated as well and retreated back to their island to regroup and fight back, which for obvious reasons was a luxury the French did not have, is not bashing or showing a lack of respect for the sacrifice of British troops, it&#8217;s a fact.<br />
There&#8217;s a reason Britan was never invaded in its long history and it&#8217;s called the English Channel. Another fact<br />
 The Brits are not genetically more courageous than the French. Another fact.</p>
<p>And frankly if that&#8217;s all the bashing you will ever encounter, it kinda pales in comparison to the almost daily regiment of being called a coward, smelly, arrogant we have to suffer through.</p>
<p>And now if you wanna contend that American bashing and French-bashing are absolutely similar then you&#8217;re going to show us documented evidence (and not that Jean François Revel essay which, unlike alll the trolls who have never bothered to read it, is actually more a documented history of the competition between 2 ideologies than it is a history of american bashing by French people) or you will definitely be labeled a troll</p>
<p>And FYI Charles Bremner&#8217;s blog is not a nefarious little blog but  one of the biggest English speaking blog about France and it has a definite anti-French slant. At least do your homework before coming here to point fingers.</p>
<p>ps: And sorry but of course only someone with a major axe to grind about the French is gonna take time and come here on this anti French-bashing blog of all places to basically tell us to shut [ Blog comment rule 2 ] up and take the bashing with a smile and to not under any circumstances dare fight back.<br />
Who do you think you&#8217;re fooling ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc @ Miquelon.org</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc @ Miquelon.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>Can we refrain from name-calling and personal attacks in the comment section please. 

As well, all participants in the comment section should ponder Nietzsche&#039;s following aphorism : &quot;The worst readers are those who behave like plundering troops: they take away a few things they can use, dirty and confound the remainder, and revile the whole.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we refrain from name-calling and personal attacks in the comment section please. </p>
<p>As well, all participants in the comment section should ponder Nietzsche&#8217;s following aphorism : &#8220;The worst readers are those who behave like plundering troops: they take away a few things they can use, dirty and confound the remainder, and revile the whole.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc @ Miquelon.org</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3202</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc @ Miquelon.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3202</guid>
		<description>I just noticed the disclaimer was no longer visible since we changed to the paged comments plugin. I added the disclaimer to another file so it is once again visible. 

&quot;Comments on this website are the &lt;a href=&quot;../../../../about/terms-of-service/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;responsibility&lt;/a&gt; of their authors and are subject to the &lt;a href=&quot;../../../../about/blog-comment-rules/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog Comment Rules&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just noticed the disclaimer was no longer visible since we changed to the paged comments plugin. I added the disclaimer to another file so it is once again visible. </p>
<p>&#8220;Comments on this website are the <a href="../../../../about/terms-of-service/" rel="nofollow">responsibility</a> of their authors and are subject to the <a href="../../../../about/blog-comment-rules/" rel="nofollow">Blog Comment Rules</a>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc @ Miquelon.org</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc @ Miquelon.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>Sharon - Could we not confuse the site&#039;s content with the comment sections. People are encouraged to voice their opinions and it is clearly stated that comments are the sole responsibility of their respective authors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon &#8211; Could we not confuse the site&#8217;s content with the comment sections. People are encouraged to voice their opinions and it is clearly stated that comments are the sole responsibility of their respective authors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>Fred, of course you don&#039;t recongise this site attacking the Brits and Americans.  I suppose snide remarks about the British running away at Dunkirk , running back to their little island is not an attack directed at the entire British people whereas pointing out well established historical facts such as the French leadership&#039;s lack of courage during WW2 is an attack on the entire French people ? LOL

Thanks for proving my point.  
I am still waiting for you to practise what you preach by taking to task those here who bashed the British with their snide remaks about Dunkirk. Oh I forgot according to you that is not bashing but heaven forbid that anyone should dare tell any unpleasant facts about the French. 

Your [ Blog comment rule 3 ]. This site has plenty of attacks on America (some of the bashing is by you) which may explain why you don&#039;t see any attacks on the USA or British in this site brimming with half truths, lies, distortions, and twisting of facts in order to demonise the Brits &amp; USA. That is what bashing is.
Since you are one of those who indulges in bashing America, it doesn&#039;t come as a surprise that you don&#039;t see any attacks on the USA in this site.

On the contrary it is you who can&#039;t see the difference between truth/facts and bashing.  Those who howl and scream about French bashing in this site are the ones who are the most rabid American bashers.
Yes, I know I will now be labelled a troll, French basher, etc etc...yawn for pointing out the behaviour of some posters here . I can hardly wait for the false accusations to begin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred, of course you don&#8217;t recongise this site attacking the Brits and Americans.  I suppose snide remarks about the British running away at Dunkirk , running back to their little island is not an attack directed at the entire British people whereas pointing out well established historical facts such as the French leadership&#8217;s lack of courage during WW2 is an attack on the entire French people ? LOL</p>
<p>Thanks for proving my point. <br />
I am still waiting for you to practise what you preach by taking to task those here who bashed the British with their snide remaks about Dunkirk. Oh I forgot according to you that is not bashing but heaven forbid that anyone should dare tell any unpleasant facts about the French. </p>
<p>Your [ Blog comment rule 3 ]. This site has plenty of attacks on America (some of the bashing is by you) which may explain why you don&#8217;t see any attacks on the USA or British in this site brimming with half truths, lies, distortions, and twisting of facts in order to demonise the Brits &amp; USA. That is what bashing is.<br />
Since you are one of those who indulges in bashing America, it doesn&#8217;t come as a surprise that you don&#8217;t see any attacks on the USA in this site.</p>
<p>On the contrary it is you who can&#8217;t see the difference between truth/facts and bashing.  Those who howl and scream about French bashing in this site are the ones who are the most rabid American bashers.<br />
Yes, I know I will now be labelled a troll, French basher, etc etc&#8230;yawn for pointing out the behaviour of some posters here . I can hardly wait for the false accusations to begin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Orth</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-4/#comment-3199</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Orth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3199</guid>
		<description>I recognize attacks on comments, videos, commentary slurs,political positions etc. I do not recognize this site attacking  either the United States or the United Kingdom. That&#039;s the difference, French-bashing is directed at the entire French people, culture, Nation. Enormous difference. If you can not see the difference, then there is really nothing that I can say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recognize attacks on comments, videos, commentary slurs,political positions etc. I do not recognize this site attacking  either the United States or the United Kingdom. That&#8217;s the difference, French-bashing is directed at the entire French people, culture, Nation. Enormous difference. If you can not see the difference, then there is really nothing that I can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-3/#comment-3198</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3198</guid>
		<description>This is eactly what I meant. 
Anyone who dares to speak the truth is immediately bashed ...as trying to justify French bashing. Can you show some evidence of where I tried to justify French bashing....oh let me see by pointing out that what goes on in this site is  people counter criticism of France by bashing Americans &amp; Brits . That is not justifying French bashing, that is exposing the hypocrisy and double standards of those who don&#039;t practise what they preach.  This is what I meant by half truths , lies , distortions and twisting of facts.  False accusations of trying to justify French bashing is immediatedly thrown . Whats next? I am waiting with bated breath for the other false accusations to be thrown such as &quot;troll&quot;  and &quot;French basher&quot; and of belonging to some nefarious blog or other .  Thats the usual pattern here.  

This pattern of behaviour occurs time and time again. Level one false accusation after another to anyone who dares to point out facts which is  not to their liking. 

So thank you for proving my point.  

PS: So, you have to put up with bashing for 7 years? 
Well., the Americans have had to put up with rabid bashing for more than 60 years ....food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is eactly what I meant.<br />
Anyone who dares to speak the truth is immediately bashed &#8230;as trying to justify French bashing. Can you show some evidence of where I tried to justify French bashing&#8230;.oh let me see by pointing out that what goes on in this site is  people counter criticism of France by bashing Americans &amp; Brits . That is not justifying French bashing, that is exposing the hypocrisy and double standards of those who don&#8217;t practise what they preach.  This is what I meant by half truths , lies , distortions and twisting of facts.  False accusations of trying to justify French bashing is immediatedly thrown . Whats next? I am waiting with bated breath for the other false accusations to be thrown such as &#8220;troll&#8221;  and &#8220;French basher&#8221; and of belonging to some nefarious blog or other .  Thats the usual pattern here.  </p>
<p>This pattern of behaviour occurs time and time again. Level one false accusation after another to anyone who dares to point out facts which is  not to their liking. </p>
<p>So thank you for proving my point.  </p>
<p>PS: So, you have to put up with bashing for 7 years?<br />
Well., the Americans have had to put up with rabid bashing for more than 60 years &#8230;.food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney hasn't left the building</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-3/#comment-3197</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney hasn't left the building</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3197</guid>
		<description>Sorry Sharon.
But 7 years of being called a coward almost daily by your compatriots has its little inconveniences.  The French (amazingly so) are human as well.

And this is an anti French-bashing blog.  Obviously if your sole contribution to the blog is not only trying your damdest to justify French bashing but condemning the people who fight it as well by throwing histrionics about WWII(what else) and holier than though rulings around,  well, what do you expect ?

As for the distortion of facts, people in glass houses shouldn&#039;t throw stones...


Valid criticism. Sure. But on both sides. Otherwise, it&#039;s just a one sided bash fest and condemnations from one smug morally superior side against another side who has no choice but to acquiesce grovelingly with a smile on its face.  And you wouldn&#039;t want that, would you, Sharon ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Sharon.<br />
But 7 years of being called a coward almost daily by your compatriots has its little inconveniences.  The French (amazingly so) are human as well.</p>
<p>And this is an anti French-bashing blog.  Obviously if your sole contribution to the blog is not only trying your damdest to justify French bashing but condemning the people who fight it as well by throwing histrionics about WWII(what else) and holier than though rulings around,  well, what do you expect ?</p>
<p>As for the distortion of facts, people in glass houses shouldn&#8217;t throw stones&#8230;</p>
<p>Valid criticism. Sure. But on both sides. Otherwise, it&#8217;s just a one sided bash fest and condemnations from one smug morally superior side against another side who has no choice but to acquiesce grovelingly with a smile on its face.  And you wouldn&#8217;t want that, would you, Sharon ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-3/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>Funny,  I didn&#039;t hear you tell those posters here who made snide remarks about the British runing away at Dunkirk &amp; runing back to their little island  to honor the sacrifice of the British troops at Dunkirk . This double standard is what I am talking about.

So,  I think your remarks about honoring the sacrifice of all Allied troops should be directed at them.  


Granted their is French bashing,  just as their is American bashing &amp; British bashing.  This is probably indulged by a tiny minority but the problem with this site is that most (including you) counter even valid criticism of France with American &amp; British bashing.  There are countless examples of you in this site when faced with some unflattering facts about France, trying to paint the Brits or Americans as even worse by indulging in half truths , distortions &amp; twisting of facts. 

Prehaps you &amp; others in site who complain about French bashing should practise what you preach......telling people to not bash France while countering any valid criticism of France with attacks on America/Britain by distorting or twisting of facts, half truths or bringing up past American sins is what generally goes on here. You can&#039;t have it both ways. 

Reading the various posts here, one cannot help but notice that this site is a comfortable place for [ Blog comment rule 3 ] who are prejudiced against Americans &amp; Brits. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny,  I didn&#8217;t hear you tell those posters here who made snide remarks about the British runing away at Dunkirk &amp; runing back to their little island  to honor the sacrifice of the British troops at Dunkirk . This double standard is what I am talking about.</p>
<p>So,  I think your remarks about honoring the sacrifice of all Allied troops should be directed at them.  </p>
<p>Granted their is French bashing,  just as their is American bashing &amp; British bashing.  This is probably indulged by a tiny minority but the problem with this site is that most (including you) counter even valid criticism of France with American &amp; British bashing.  There are countless examples of you in this site when faced with some unflattering facts about France, trying to paint the Brits or Americans as even worse by indulging in half truths , distortions &amp; twisting of facts. </p>
<p>Prehaps you &amp; others in site who complain about French bashing should practise what you preach&#8230;&#8230;telling people to not bash France while countering any valid criticism of France with attacks on America/Britain by distorting or twisting of facts, half truths or bringing up past American sins is what generally goes on here. You can&#8217;t have it both ways. </p>
<p>Reading the various posts here, one cannot help but notice that this site is a comfortable place for [ Blog comment rule 3 ] who are prejudiced against Americans &amp; Brits. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Orth</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-3/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Orth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>Sharon, Thank you for your viewpoint. I do not necessarily agree that this blog is anti-truth, UK or US, but more of a clarification site that takes issue with certain positions taken by CERTAIN (not all) Brits, Americans, wrters and pundents. Granted, the thrust of the conversation is not about the vast accomplisments of the British or Americans, but, I believe that that is due to the need to deal with the attacks of a few. I do think that we can probably agree that the US, Britain and France have within their population some 35%, give or take, that are aggresively negative about a lot of issues, including the &quot;foreign&quot; elements that they see in their own nation but especially other nations. Of that percentage, maybe a quarter can be described as rabid.  I would contend that this site, and others, are targeted at identifying and supporting the reduction of the rabid bashers - American, British and French, especially French-bashers.
As for Dunkirk, the Brits were fantastic with the individuals who sailled over in their little boats and rescued the troops. Please do also honor the sacrifice of the French troops who did give their all to make it all possible. I, personally, find it rather easy to horor and respect both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon, Thank you for your viewpoint. I do not necessarily agree that this blog is anti-truth, UK or US, but more of a clarification site that takes issue with certain positions taken by CERTAIN (not all) Brits, Americans, wrters and pundents. Granted, the thrust of the conversation is not about the vast accomplisments of the British or Americans, but, I believe that that is due to the need to deal with the attacks of a few. I do think that we can probably agree that the US, Britain and France have within their population some 35%, give or take, that are aggresively negative about a lot of issues, including the &#8220;foreign&#8221; elements that they see in their own nation but especially other nations. Of that percentage, maybe a quarter can be described as rabid.  I would contend that this site, and others, are targeted at identifying and supporting the reduction of the rabid bashers &#8211; American, British and French, especially French-bashers.<br />
As for Dunkirk, the Brits were fantastic with the individuals who sailled over in their little boats and rescued the troops. Please do also honor the sacrifice of the French troops who did give their all to make it all possible. I, personally, find it rather easy to horor and respect both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.miquelon.org/2009/07/26/so-bridget-johnson-you-think-youre-funny/comment-page-3/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.miquelon.org/?p=385#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>After observing this site for quite some time now it  is only too obvious that this is a basically a propaganda site,  hence the hostility to historical facts which in any way show France in a bad light.

Anyone who dares to provide historical facts to counter the distortions, half truths, twisting of facts &amp; lies posted by participants here to bash the British &amp; Americans.....will immediately be called a &quot;troll&quot; or &quot;French basher&quot; and accused of belonging to various  so called nefarious blogs which most people have never even heard of.

This pattern is repeated time and time again . The latest example is Big M&#039;s reasoned rebuttal to some vicious ant-British propaganda about Dunkirk .
 
Bashing is telling lies, half truths, distortions &amp; twisting of facts in order to demonise . Telling the truth is not bashing.  France surrendered and was occuppied by the Germans, Vichy collaborated with the Nazis. What bought about these events was a lack of courage by the French leadership. Anybody who dares point this out this fact will  immediately be branded a troll and French basher in this propanda site. 

It appears that the Fascist mentality is still alive in Europe .  Not surprising as fascism, nazism &amp; communism were made in Europe   Yes, I know pointing out this fact thatt Europe gave birth to these three murderous ideologies will immediately result in be being branded as a troll and basher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After observing this site for quite some time now it  is only too obvious that this is a basically a propaganda site,  hence the hostility to historical facts which in any way show France in a bad light.</p>
<p>Anyone who dares to provide historical facts to counter the distortions, half truths, twisting of facts &amp; lies posted by participants here to bash the British &amp; Americans&#8230;..will immediately be called a &#8220;troll&#8221; or &#8220;French basher&#8221; and accused of belonging to various  so called nefarious blogs which most people have never even heard of.</p>
<p>This pattern is repeated time and time again . The latest example is Big M&#8217;s reasoned rebuttal to some vicious ant-British propaganda about Dunkirk .<br />
 <br />
Bashing is telling lies, half truths, distortions &amp; twisting of facts in order to demonise . Telling the truth is not bashing.  France surrendered and was occuppied by the Germans, Vichy collaborated with the Nazis. What bought about these events was a lack of courage by the French leadership. Anybody who dares point this out this fact will  immediately be branded a troll and French basher in this propanda site. </p>
<p>It appears that the Fascist mentality is still alive in Europe .  Not surprising as fascism, nazism &amp; communism were made in Europe   Yes, I know pointing out this fact thatt Europe gave birth to these three murderous ideologies will immediately result in be being branded as a troll and basher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
