Doug Stanhope and Saving the French
Video - Twitter this! August 13th, 2009Comments on this website are the responsibility of their authors and are subject to the Blog Comment Rules.
135 Responses to “Doug Stanhope and Saving the French”
Pages: « 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] Show All
Pages: « 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] Show All
Add Miquelon.org to my del.icio.us
August 31st, 2009 at 2:45 am
What I have learned from “sharon” :
August 31st, 2009 at 8:17 am
[[All that frothing in the mouth ….hmm, must have hit some uncomfortable truths ]]
Oh yeah sure. A joke like you defending the HMQ. I’m so offended. lol
[[Yet sharon has yet to tell us what he/she has done in his/her country of residence to fight anti-Americanism [if he/she is not a resident of the USA ... ].]]
It would be even funnier to ask it what it has done to fight anti-French sentiments in its country.
August 31st, 2009 at 1:49 pm
And now for the coup de grâce – which incidentally is not pronounced “coup de gras”. We also don’t say “bone appeteet” nor do we say “déja vou”.
From Wikipedia’s pages on logical fallacies.
Tu quoque, from Latin for “You, too” or “You, also”) is a Latin term that describes a kind of logical fallacy. A tu quoque argument attempts to discredit the opponent’s position by asserting his failure to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. It is considered an ad hominem argument, since it focuses on the party itself, rather than its positions.
Two wrongs make a right is a logical fallacy that occurs when it is assumed that if one wrong is committed, another wrong will cancel it out. Like many fallacies, it typically appears as the hidden major premise in an enthymeme—an unstated assumption which must be true for the premises to lead to the conclusion. This is an example of an informal fallacy.
August 31st, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Sharon, I’ve been hinting at your location because of certain colloquialisms as well as comments about Quebec, Canada etc. No emails will be published ever.
September 1st, 2009 at 8:44 am
#180
broken record much, trollie.
1) This is a French-bashing blog. Main concern = French bashing. Deal with it.
Stop whining. What you call American/British bashing on this blog are just histrionics thrown right back at the trolls who come here to lecture us out of the goodness of their hearts.
And it pales in comparison with real French-bashing which consists of well documented ethnic slurs such as the French are cowards, dirty, lazy etc.
You’ll rarely see a French person start the histrionics throwing or bash the American/British out of the blue. That’s a fact.
2)If you don’t care about French-bashing then your presence on an anti-French blog is de facto suspicious. How’d you wind up here by the way ?
See 1) about American/British bashing.
3) French or non French people don’t have to do anything. But if you’re gonna contribute to an anti French-bashing blog, then of course you are expected to at least care about the issue. If you only come here to complain about British/American British, then that makes you obviously a troll.
4) As miquelon has said. People shouldn’t be held perpetually guilty of past crimes committed by their ancestors. French, British Americans or otherwise. The rest is conjecture on your part.
See 1) about American/British bashing.
5) You have come up with a completely imaginary scenario there.
Anyway see 4) and 1).
Your post #180 summarizes your entire contribution to miquelon.org.
You are entitled to your opinion, however misguided it might be.
I think we got it by now.
So If you got nothing else to contribute. Will you finally leave ?